Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Saints of the Most High v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Saints of the Most High
Defendant:
Ricky Carter, Terry Green and Gulfside Casino Partnership doing business as Island View Casino Resort
Interested Party:
Father Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Fain v. Green et al
as 5:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Fain
Defendant:
Deputy Green, Logan, Children and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Fain
Defendant:
Green, Logan and Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafayette v. SMCI - Greene County et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Lafayette
Defendant:
SMCI - Greene County and Lucy Martin
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Green
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2022ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Latisha R. Smith
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Oby v. John Doe
as 5:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Sherman Oby
Defendant:
John Doe, Captain J. Green, R. Logan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 1:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 3:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
