Cases 41 - 50 of 506
Fields #257135 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00575
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
Hanson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pixley v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2016cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pixley
Defendant:
Yuma, City of , Michael Dean , Joseph Van Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scarlet # 154202 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Katrina Luv Scarlet
Defendant:
Unknown Areola, Unknown Kepney, Unknown Gant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camboni v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2015cv02538
Plaintiff:
Anthony Camboni
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich , Susan Brnovich , Brian Bergin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Chalak-MMT PV LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02158
Plaintiff:
Christian Collins
Defendant:
Chalak-MMT PV LLC and Troy Horning
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hollowell v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2015cv02045
Plaintiff:
Veronica R Hollowell
Movant:
Vivian Epps
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Gregory McKay, Monique D Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brinkman # 133444 v. Moody et al
as 2:2015cv01839
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Unknown Horn, Unknown Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01423
Petitioner:
Clinton J Dennis
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Tom Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheah et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jean Cheah , Randall Putman , Lee Dudley Blevins Separate Property Revocable Trust and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , SFPP LP, Kinder Morgan Operating LP D and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander #105500 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Charles LaVerne Alexander, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samual Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
