Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Hale et al v. DePuy Orthopedics Inc et al
as 1:2017dp20051
Plaintiff:
Patsy Hale and Thomas Hale
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics Inc , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sales v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Arkmael Ray Sales
Defendant:
Arthur Hale, Mary Lawrence, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enon Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Clark County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Enon Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Clark County Board of County Commissioners and Thomas A Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enon Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Clark County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Enon Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Clark County Board of County Commissioners and Thomas A Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Mason
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Missy Roush, Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Turnure et al
as 5:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Charod Hale
Defendant:
John Turnure, Matthew David Whitmire and Akron Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik v. GE Aircraft Engines et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
GE Aircraft Engines, Rich Jendrix, Lisa Jendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Bunce
as 1:2016cv02967
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hale and Patrick Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Bunce
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plesia v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02205
Plaintiff:
Ryan Plesia
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., Eric Vessey and John Hale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Thomas v. Erdos et al
as 1:2016cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T. Thomas
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, Brian Noland, Jeremy Oppy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
