Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv01230
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State Board of Pharmacy, Board of Regents New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANAEME v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
USA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND FINANCIAL REGULATION, OFFICE OF LICENSING AND REGULATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv01573
Defendant:
Acevado, S. Afhook, E. Aguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01161
Defendant:
Ed, Mr. Acevado, S. Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , San Diego County, California, San Diego County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. Sam Holdings, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv04706
Plaintiff:
Eddie King , Debbie King , Billy Ray Pitcher and others
Defendant:
Sam Holdings, LLC and Handson Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lotmore Shipping Company Limited v. Remy Handson
as 1:2010cv23326
Plaintiff:
Lotmore Shipping Company Limited
Defendant:
Remy Handson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1403
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HANDSON v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv69907
Plaintiff:
JOAN HANDSON
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Handson v. A P Green Industries
as TXN/4:00-CV-01349
Plaintiff:
Handson
Defendant:
A P Green Industries
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
