Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Smith v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03009
Defendant:
John Herring, Marvin Casino and Chineta Williams
Plaintiff:
Vernon M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canady v. Maury Correctional Institution
as 5:2020ct03377
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Canady
Defendant:
Maury Correctional Institution, John Doe and John Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Cloud Based et al
as 7:2020cv00187
Defendant:
New Hanover Court, Margaret Hagett, Cloud Based and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Triton Marine Services, Inc. v. M/V SEAVEYOR (O.N. 1084991), her boats, dinghies, tackle, apparel, furniture, engines, fishing history and permits, and appurtenances, etc., in rem,
as 4:2020cv00143
Defendant:
M/V SEAVEYOR (O.N. 1084991), her boats, dinghies, tackle, apparel, furniture, engines, fishing history and permits, and appurtenances, etc., in rem,
Not Classified By Court:
Tate Lawrence
Plaintiff:
Triton Marine Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinton v. Herring et al
as 5:2020hc02138
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and John Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lomick v. Lews et al
as 5:2020ct03208
Plaintiff:
James William Lomick
Defendant:
Dr. Lews, C. Brown, Ms. Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Cooper et al
as 5:2020ct03163
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Herring
as 5:2020hc02051
Petitioner:
David Anthony McKinney
Respondent:
John A. Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKinney v. Herring
as 5:2020hc02049
Petitioner:
David Anthony McKinney
Respondent:
John A. Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
