Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wen Lin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60246
Petitioner:
WEN HUA LIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hui Lin v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-11149
Petitioner:
HUI HUA LIN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bank of America, NA v. A-1 Food Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01683
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, NA
Defendant:
A-1 Food Services, Inc., Jian Bin Zheng, Hua Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zhang v. Holder
as 11-717
Petitioner:
Chang Bin Zhang and Yue Hua Lin, AKA Rou Hua Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 10-5060
Petitioner:
Yuan Hua Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
2875 Restaurant, Inc. et al v. Li et al
as 1:2010cv07194
Plaintiff:
2875 Restaurant, Inc., May Kwan Si, Inc., 1160 Third Avenue Food Service, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Gui Ming Li , Hang Jian Chi , Guo Ping Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al
as 3:2010cv03054
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Shelley Xue Hua Lin
Defendant:
Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including, Approximately 4,426 Articles of Counterfeit Merchandise from L&J Fashion Company, 2585 Taylor St., San Francisco, CA, Approximately 4,581 Articles of Counterfeit Merchandise from New CWK Gift, 2655 Taylor St., San Francisco, CA and others
Claimant:
Huamin Wu Mei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lin v. Holder
as 10-1912
Petitioner:
Ping Hua Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 10-1413
Petitioner:
Hua Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
