Cases 41 - 50 of 55
NOEL v. CHAPMAN et al
as 1:2015cv01951
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, ALONZO CHAPMAN, DAVID HAMMACK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NOEL
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Neal et al
as 3:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Howard Morton, Bessie Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DECRANE et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
DENISE GAY DECRANE and CHRISTOPHER HAGAN HUFF
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC. v. GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
as 4:2014cv00098
Defendant:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HUFF CONTRACTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Huff v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01678
Plaintiff:
Lizzie Huff
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction LLC and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walz v. Jones Huff & Jones
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brad Walz
Defendant:
Jones Huff & Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCulloch v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael McCulloch
Defendant:
Darius Powell , James Dillon , John Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUFF v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv00640
Petitioner:
RAYMOND HUFF
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huff v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00281
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Huff
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Huff
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
