Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Humphreys v. Windham Professionals, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01455
Plaintiff:
Shane Humphreys
Defendant:
Windham Professionals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUGHES v. HARPER et al
as 2:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. HUGHES
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, SGT. KASS, SGT. COULTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREY v. PFIZER INC.
as 2:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
DORIS A. HUMPHREY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv02664
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Graig Buck, Michael Metrinko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREYS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03516
Petitioner:
EDWIN H. HUMPHREYS, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUMPHREY v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv03070
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JEROME WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUMPHREY v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
FLOYD HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY, DEPUTY WARDEN, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. LVNV FUNDING LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01650
Plaintiff:
CARLTON HUMPHREY
Defendant:
LVNV FUNDING LLC and EDWIN ABRAHAMSEN & ASSOC., PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Humphrey v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A Humphrey
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMPHREYS v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
as 5:2012cv06395
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
