Cases 41 - 50 of 620
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: M/V Hunter T
as 3:2023cv00222
In Re:
M/V Hunter T
Petitioner:
T&T Offshore Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Gerald Arukwe and Jose Uresti
Counter Claimant:
AET Lightering Services LLC and AET Offshore Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hunter Ready Mix, LLC v. GCC Permian, LLC
as 7:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Hunter Ready Mix, LLC
Defendant:
GCC Permian, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Locker et al
as 5:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Robert Locker, Guadalupe County, Hunter Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2023cv00220
In Re:
M/V Hunter T
Petitioner:
T&T Offshore, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2023cv00221
In Re:
M/V Hunter T
Petitioner:
T&T Offshore Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Hunter v. Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority
as 3:2023cv01208
Defendant:
Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority and MOHELA
Plaintiff:
Taileah Hunter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Waters v. Ricks et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Hunter Waters
Defendant:
Elizabeth Ricks and Adam Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Berg v. The Regent et al
as 4:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R. Berg
Defendant:
The Regent and Hunter Warfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
