Cases 41 - 50 of 1,943
Wood v. King
as 2:2023cv12674
Petitioner:
Matthew Jay Wood, I
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Chris King
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brenda Tracy, LLC et al v. Alvarado et al
as 1:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Brenda Tracey, LLC, Set The Expectation, Unknown Parties and others
Defendant:
Agustin Alvarado, Mel Tucker, Jennifer Z. Belveal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
Hale et al v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fisher, Dana Hale and William Pruesner
Defendant:
Clinton County, Chad Bashore, Jeffrey Armbrustmacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 et al
as 2:2023cv12500
Plaintiff:
Richard Strong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Andrew Johnson and Kim Cargor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong #253763 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 et al
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Richard Strong #253763
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Andrew Johnson and Kim Cargor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitan v. Maclean et al
as 2:2023cv12439
Plaintiff:
Randall Richard Levitan
Defendant:
Maclean, Johnson, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conarton et al v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Conarton and Gwendolyn Chantini Conarton
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arney et al v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Arney and Andrea Gail Arney
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
