Cases 41 - 50 of 25,399
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
Stephen J. Fay, Karen Fay, James S. Fay, Jr., and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
JEAVONS v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01863
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER JEAVONS
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DUHL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
PAIGE S. DUHL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAY v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
MEGAN ALANA DAY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LUCAS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
KEYON LUCAS
Respondent:
KATHY J. BRITTAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
RAYMOND J HARDAWAY and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARCIA v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01771
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAI ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FUENTES v. J. PERRY & SONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
MANUEL FUENTES
Defendant:
J. PERRY & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
