Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Espinoza et al
as 1:2011cv07129
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
John J Espinoza and Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 5:2011cv04918
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, San Quentin State Prison, J Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta et al v. CF&I Steel, L.P.
as 1:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Ralph Abeyta , Domingo Abraham , Martin Adakai and others
Defendant:
CF&I Steel, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews v. John Nepomuceno et al
as 2:2010cv01808
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews
Defendant:
John Nepomuceno, Lettie Burgett and Swindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alve v. Edwards et al
as 3:2010cv01389
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Alve
Defendant:
D Edwards, R Silvas, J Sigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews v. John Nepomuceno et al
as 2:2010cv03425
Defendant:
Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. John Nepomuceno and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews
Espinoza v. Sac County Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2009cv02662
Plaintiff:
Eduardo J. Espinoza
Defendant:
Sac County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braulio Espinoza v. J'al Mattoon
as 09-35705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAULIO J. ESPINOZA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
J'AL ERIN MATTOON
Lorraine J Espinoza v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2007cv01674
Plaintiff:
Lorraine J Espinoza
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eric J. Martinez v. Espinoza et al
as 1:2007cv00358
Plaintiff:
Erik J. Martinez
Defendant:
J Espinoza, J Bautista, - Rousseau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
