Cases 41 - 50 of 1,111
Kavin Rhodes v. Sam Ohta, et al
as 17-16540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM OHTA, PETER SWARTH, ANTONIO BESTARD and others
ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al
as 1:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO FRATICELLI ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN), MOONEY, GOYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 17-2631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
Stevens v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Christopher Podratz, Godwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milorad Olic v. Joe Lizaraga, et al
as 17-55986
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILORAD TEODOR OLIC, AKA Milorad Olic
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARAGA and JEFFREY BEARD
Rico v. Beard et al
as 2:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard , Michael Stainer , Clark E. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Eckstrom v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL ANDERS ECKSTROM
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, in his individual and official capacity as Secretary of Agency CDCR, JOHN DOE, in his individual and official capacity as Facility Captain over Associated Services, S. LUND, in their individual and official capacity as Officer of CMC R & R post and others
James Edwards v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55575
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Director of CDCR
Hardney v. Ferguson et al.
as 3:2017cv02390
Plaintiff:
John Hardney
Defendant:
Jeffrey Ferguson, Jeffrey Beard and Steven Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley Dayley v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-15760
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRADLEY ALAN DAYLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
