Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Alvarado-Lugo et al
as 3:2016cv02240
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jose Damian Alvarado-Lugo, Leymadith Deligne-Cotti and Conjugal Partnership Alvarado-Deligne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARQUEZ DIAZ et al v. ANCAR SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
SERGIO MARQUEZ DIAZ and JOSE ESTANGLE ALVARADO VENTURA
Defendant:
ANCAR SERVICES, INC. and CHARLES ROBERT NUGENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States v. Jose Alvarado
as 15-3679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose M. Alvarado
Avendano v. Latin Feva, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23411
Plaintiff:
Miguel Avendano
Defendant:
Latin Feva, Inc., Maria A. Alvarado, Jose Milton Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Alvarado Cisneros v. GM Electrical Contracting Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv06640
Plaintiff:
Jose Eduardo Alvarado Cisneros
Defendant:
Gerry Moylan, John Moylan, Andrew Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Alvarado et al v. City of Salinas et al
as 5:2015cv02562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Angel Alvarado and Jose Frank Alvarado
Defendant:
City of Salinas, Kelly McMillin, Scott Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Alvarado-Otero, et al
as 3:2015cv01224
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership Alvarado-Doe, Jose Orizon Alvarado-Otero, Unknown Occupant and others
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Toledo-Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72944
Petitioner:
JOSE TOLEDO-ALVARADO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Alvarado-Canas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60179
Petitioner:
JOSE DENNIS ALVARADO-CANAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
