Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Walsh v. Enge et al
as 3:2015cv01666
Defendant:
Bryant Enge and Mayor Charlie Hales
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walsh v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07057
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walsh
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Phillip Walsh
as 15-1569
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP JOSEPH WALSH
JONES v. SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2015cv02629
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Defendant:
SOMERSET PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., MATTHEW MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parris v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07934
Plaintiff:
James Parris
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Walsh, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hibu Plc et al v. Walsh
as 1:2013cv03762
Plaintiff:
Hibu Plc and Hibu Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Ayala v. Walsh et al
as 1:2013cv03163
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Ayala
Defendant:
Joseph Walsh and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayne Prater v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER EDWARD SOLVIBILE, Badge #1694, individually and as a police officer for the City of Philadephia and POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH WALSH, BADGE #5315 individually and as a police officer for the City of Philadelphia
Martin v. Hayes Robertson Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61438
Plaintiff:
Margaret Martin
Defendant:
Hayes Robertson Group, Inc. , Caren Winnifred Dement and Joseph Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Solis v. ZZ Southgate LLC et al
as 2:2011cv05252
Defendant:
James Rehm, Joseph Walsh and ZZ Southgate LLC
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
