Cases 41 - 50 of 5,637
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schilthuis v. Schilthuis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Defendant:
Big Horn County Commissioner, Big Horn County Sheriff, Big Horn County Prosecuting Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Schilthuis and Kevin Harm Schilthuis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lorick Jr v. Town of Fishkill et al
as 7:2024cv02586
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lorick JR
Defendant:
Town of Fishkill and Police Officer Jessie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP v. Exum
as 4:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP
Defendant:
Jessy Exum
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson et al v. YJOS LLC
as 5:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jessie A Johnson
Defendant:
YJOS LLC doing business as Yellowjacket Oilfield Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Weston v. Tweedy et al
as 1:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Shicola Weston
Defendant:
Jessie Lee Tweedy, V. Paulius and Associates (Inc.) and Redi Cold, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Wooden v. Department of Justice
as 5:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wooden
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hardy v. Crawford et al
as 3:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Doris Hardy
Defendant:
Jessie L. Crawford and Springfield Public Schools District 186
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
