Cases 41 - 50 of 1,080
Job v. USA
as 3:2023cv02189
Petitioner:
Travis Job
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joachin v. Dream Job Staffing et al
as 1:2023cv10083
Plaintiff:
Nadine Joachin
Defendant:
Dream Job Staffing, East Haven Nursing and Rehab Center, CHRC Legal Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Linn v. City of Monroe
as 23-30796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Montreal Linn
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Monroe, Police Jury of Ouachita Parish, Louisiana Workforce Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STEPHEN TIPTON and KYLA KRAMER v. JOB TOGOM, et al
as 3:2023cv24671
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TIPTON and KYLA KRAMER
Defendant:
J AND D TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LLC, JOB TOGOM and NYAOGA KERUBO
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
