Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Easterling Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Mrs Truss and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Crow
as 2:2020cv00468
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lee Ellison
Respondent:
John Crow, III and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Warden Crow, Warden Miles, Joseph Headley and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Jacobey Johnson, Warden Crow, William Caulfield and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00059
Defendant:
John Crow, Jefferson S. Dunn and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff:
David Dewayne Oliver, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Crow
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Walter Myers and State Of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Clark
Respondent:
Warden John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Lee Harris
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Crow, Joseph Headley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMeans v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kay Ivey, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McMeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broughton v. Murphy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Defendant:
Victorrus Felder, Anthony L. Murphy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
