Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 248
Mata #688342 v. Prelesnik
as 1:2013cv01269
Petitioner: Jeffery M. Mata #688342
Respondent: John Prelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darryl Robinson v. John Prelesnik
as 13-2577
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL A. ROBINSON, named as Hamzah Rafi Farid
Defendant - Appellant: UNKNOWN STODDARD, named as Warden Stoddard
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2425
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniels #168369 v. Prelesnik We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01141
Petitioner: Robert Lee Daniels #168369
Respondent: John Prelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv14356
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar #129278 v. Prelesnik et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff: Joseph Gregory Dunbar #129278
Defendant: John Prelesnik, Cathleen Stoddard and Daniel H. Heyns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Cantley v. John Prelesnik
as 13-2228
Petitioner - Appellant: AARON CANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden
Edward Burley v. John Prelesnik
as 13-2201
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD DONALD BURLEY
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN PRELESNIK
Cornelius #528987 v. Prelesnik We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00992
Petitioner: Michael D. Cornelius #528987
Respondent: John Prelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: James Edward
as 13-2176
Movant: In re: JAMES B. EDWARDS
Respondent: JOHN PRELESNIK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?