Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv01515
Petitioner:
Tyrone Christopher Thompson
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKee v. Dunn et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Denice McKee
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Q. Hamm, Patricia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Ivey et al
as 4:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Michael James Hubbard
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and Joseph Headley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portis v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Wyman Frazier Portis
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Joseph H. Headley, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Danny Foster, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, John Q. Hamm, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cliff v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Steve T. Cliff
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Camelia Cargle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
