Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Valencia-Caro v. USA
as 2:2012cv00494
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Valencia-Caro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Valencia v. Campus, LLC
as 1:2011cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jose Valencia
Defendant:
Campus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huskey v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv01576
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Huskey
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Jose Valencia, H. Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras et al v. The T.L.C. Group, Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
Cesar Contreras, Alejandro Alvarez and Jose Valencia
Defendant:
The T.L.C. Group, Ltd., ASO, LLC, Stephen Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Reyes et al v. Kings Point General Cement, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01677
Plaintiff:
Alberto Reyes, Ricardo Tapia and Jose Valencia
Defendant:
Kings Point General Cement, Inc., Valerio Ricci and Franca Ricco
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valencia v. USA
as 3:2009cv00352
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Valencia
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Jose Valencia-Barragan
as 09-50018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE VALENCIA-BARRAGAN
Jose Valencia-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71335
Petitioner:
JOSE VALENCIA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alexander et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02897
Plaintiff:
David Alexander, David Alexander, Wayne Bachemin and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Crotty et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv02750
Plaintiff:
Ariel B. Crotty, Nissa M. Laurelli, Randolph Wolfe and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
