Cases 41 - 50 of 119
James et al v. Federal BOP et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Woodey, Chad Tyson West, Paul McNeary and others
Defendant:
Federal BOP and FMC Lexington, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meade v. Morris et al
as 7:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Josh Pugh, Gent Maynard, Ryan Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Meade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downing v. Petry et al
as 5:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Downing
Defendant:
Todd Chitwood, Unnamed Supervisor of Individual Defendants, Unnamed Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McManus v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Bradley Alfred McManus
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Stacy Jensen, J.D. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles et al v. Lee County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Keith Combs, Jeff Ragan, Wolfe County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Charles and Billy Charels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washle v. Monro, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00779
Defendant:
Monroe, Inc. and Monro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Josh Washle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montgomery v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center and Josh Lindblom
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firman et al v. Conrad et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Defendant:
Kevin Crawford, Steve Conrad, Josh Doerr and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parker, Sr. and Demetria Firman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunello et al v. Limbalm et al
as 3:2019cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brian Casey, Tirrell Barbour and Michael Brunello
Defendant:
Allan New, Josh Limbalm, David Kineline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Limbalm et al
as 3:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Josh Limbalm and H.C.D.C.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Riley Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
