Cases 41 - 50 of 519
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02377
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEDRO v. MAMMUTH & ROSENBERG et al
as 2:2020cv05905
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
ESQUIRE JESSICA M. KEOUGH, ANNETTE V. URIONDO, ESQUIRE WILLIAM H. PUGH, V and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04916
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARLENE et al v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2020cv00292
Plaintiff:
GARY KARLENE and PAMELA KARLENE
Defendant:
THE KEYSTONE RURAL HEALTH CONSORTIA, INC. trading and doing business as THE KANE DENTAL CENTER, CHRISTOPHER YOUNG and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FLAHERTY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2020cv01491
Plaintiff:
JULIE FLAHERTY and JULIANN FLAHERTY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY as owner and operator of JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER-SC d/b/a KANE SCOTT CENTER, a skilled nursing facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANE-ABRAMOWITZ et al v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv04756
Plaintiff:
DAVID KANE-ABRAMOWITZ, SHERYL KANE-ABRAMOWITZ and DAVID ABRAMOWITZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCALL v. KANE et al
as 2:2020cv00924
Defendant:
DEBORAH KANE, JUANITA BARBER, GREGORY NANNY and others
Plaintiff:
DAIJON MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
