Cases 41 - 50 of 90
CARROLL v. ALVEY
as 1:2018cv02868
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
JORDAN CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARROLL v. ALVEY
as 3:2018cv00177
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
J. CARROLL and JORDAN CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Humes v. Kathy Alvey
as 18-2493
Petitioner:
EDWARD HUMES
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, Superintendent
HOSKINS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00103
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, ANGELA BAKER, DIANE CHAPMAN-HOFFMAN and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LANDARIUS HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2017cv00204
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, ROBERT CARTER, MR. KRESS and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CORY BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAUCETT v. ALVEY
as 3:2017cv00198
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FAUCETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SELBY v. HILL et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., CURTIS T. HILL, JR. and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JODY D. SELBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERWOOD v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2017cv00122
Defendant:
SHIRLEY ALLARD, KATHY ALVEY, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LAVOLPA v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2017cv00090
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, PRICE and ZELLERS
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAVOLPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
