Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05765
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MORGAN et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06934
Plaintiff:
AMIE MORGAN , JENNIFER BRIGGEMAN , JAMIE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. , ROERIG and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEELING v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv06764
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CRUZ v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2012cv05026
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO CRUZ, JR.
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, MATT GEER , ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEELING et al v. MCGUIGAN LAW OFFICE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04388
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEELING and MELANIE KEELING
Defendant:
MCGUIGAN LAW OFFICE, LLC, KENTWOOD LAW GROUP and ROOMS-TO-GO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KEELING v. KELLY
as 2:2012cv02720
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant:
LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv01069
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MUNICIPAL COURT, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2011cv00318
Petitioner:
ANDREW AIMEE KEEL
Respondent:
COLEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEEL v. ARIA FRANKFORD HOSPITAL (BUCKS) et al
as 2:2011cv07148
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
ARIA FRANKFORD HOSPITAL (BUCKS), KATHY WISHIEWSKI and FEDERAL DEFENDER OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEELING v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56031
Plaintiff:
GORDON M. KEELING
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
