Cases 41 - 50 of 1,268
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv03883
Plaintiff:
LISA KING
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04687
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
COX v. PHILLY CAR KINGS, ET. AL.
as 2:2023cv04555
Plaintiff:
SHEREE COX
Defendant:
PHILLY CAR KINGS and MAYFAIR IMPORT CARE SALES, INS.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STACHE PRODUCTS, LLC v. TK VIENNA INC.
as 5:2023cv04267
Plaintiff:
STACHE PRODUCTS, LLC
Defendant:
TK VIENNA INC. doing business as TOBACCO KING & VAPE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dantone v. King's College
as 3:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Michael Dantone
Defendant:
King's College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
