Cases 41 - 50 of 124
JAMISON v. BEARD et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
DASHAWN L. JAMISON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, J. BARRY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juantez Tennyson v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 11-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUANTEZ TENNYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Jose Ramos v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-1166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, In their individual capacity, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, In their individual capacity, VINCENT MOONEY and others
Brown v. Camp Hill et al
as 3:2010cv02612
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Camp Hill, Central Office Executive Staff, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John McDowell v. Raymond Litz, et al
as 10-4635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MCDOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LITZ, Superintendent, JAMES T. WYNDER, JR., MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
MCCLAIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2010cv07241
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MALVIN S. LOCKETT, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Jones v. Hashagen, et al
as 10-4554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
HASHAGEN, LINHART, JOSEPH SEMON and others
Kenneth Wright v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 10-4378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Ryheim Hill v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 10-3995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYHEIM HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
