Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Middleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv02164
Plaintiff:
Edna Kelley Middleton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lowe-Kelley v. Ford
as 1:2016cv00082
Petitioner:
Charles E. Lowe-Kelley
Respondent:
Tammy Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clair v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv02263
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Clair
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Recontrust Company N.A., Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelley v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2016cv00632
Petitioner:
Marty Joe Kelley
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Princes-Kelley v. Heartland Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02015
Plaintiff:
Melody R. Princes-Kelley
Defendant:
Heartland Express, Inc. and Emery Charles Mayoros
Miscellaneou:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Anthony Ray v. Bradley County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2015cv00293
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee , Gabe Thomas, Ron Raddish and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anthony Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
R. Scott Kelley and Tamara Trawick
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc , Volkswagen AG and Audi AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Martinez v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02618
Plaintiff:
Douglas Martinez
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, William Gupton, Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffer v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00860
Plaintiff:
Jacob Duffer
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee , f/n/u Henry , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
