Cases 41 - 50 of 142
BAILEY v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00121
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCKANT v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv02528
Petitioner:
BRIAN MCKANT
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUMMA v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv02326
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MUMMA
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POINDEXTER v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2014cv01891
Petitioner:
ERIC POINDEXTER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLETT v. HARRINGTON et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILLETT
Defendant:
JAMES HARRINGTON , KENNETH CAMERON , JAMIE BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodens v. Cameron et al
as 3:2014cv00212
Petitioner:
Joseph B Woodens
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROCK v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROCK
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, HUNT, NEGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PISKANIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2013cv00143
Petitioner:
RICHARD MAX CRAWFORD, III
Respondent:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA , JOHN E. WETZEL and KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Piskanin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kenneth Cameron and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
