Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Vignolo v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02976
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Jo Gentry and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Leonard D Vignolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunt v. Dzurenda
as 2:2017cv02642
Defendant:
Dir James Dzurenda
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Naughton
as 3:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Defendant:
Dr. Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Naughton et al
as 3:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Defendant:
Dr. Dana Marks and Dr. Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Reyes et al
as 2:2017cv01936
Defendant:
Correctional officers at Clark County Detention Center, B. Embrey, V Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Kohn et al
as 2:2017cv01607
Defendant:
Phillip J. Kohn and Julia M Murray
Plaintiff:
Leonard R Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. G2 Ventures LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01576
Defendant:
Arbuckle Drive Homeowners Association, Inc., G2 Ventures LLC, Leonard D. Purcell and others
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCaskill v. Baca et al
as 3:2017cv00305
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Leonard McCaskill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Folmar v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01364
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Folmar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
