Cases 41 - 50 of 422
Washington v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00509
Petitioner:
Leroy D. Washington
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Washington v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Leroy D. Washington
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martinez et al v. Anderson County, TX et al
as 6:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Cristian Martinez and Paul Estrada
Defendant:
Anderson County, TX and Karina Garcia
Consolidated Defendant:
Edward Leroy Perkins and Anderson County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Henderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01275
Petitioner:
Leroy Henderson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hays v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00375
Petitioner:
Sean Leroy Hays
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. D. Miles Brissette et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Leroy Washington
Defendant:
D. Miles Brissette, Grayson Founder, Judge Wayne Salvant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Sergeant Briggs et al
as 4:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
Ron Leroy Burchfield
Defendant:
Sergeant Briggs, Sergeant Magnes, Nurse Jenniffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wafer v. Fremont Mortgage Co
as 3:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Leroy Wafer
Defendant:
Fremont Mortgage Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burchfield v. Officer Luborski
as 4:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Ron Leroy Burchfield
Defendant:
Officer Luborski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
