Cases 41 - 50 of 2,301
Ratcliff v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2021cv00133
Defendant:
Dodge Jeep, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Polk County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Andrew Colby Livingston
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Parker et al
as 4:2021cv01980
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Steve Vic Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parmeley v. Titus County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Captain Price, John P. Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Parmeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speights et al v. Stac Biziness Solutions, LLC
as 4:2021cv01394
Plaintiff:
Kittson Speights, Julie Livingston, Seva Thornton, LLC and others
Defendant:
Stac Biziness Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00205
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Andrew Colby Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livingston v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2021cv00055
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Andrew Colby Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livingston v. Use of Force and Field Force et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Cameron County District Court, TDCJ Private Facility, B-Side Building Major and others
Plaintiff:
Amit Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00032
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
MD Amit Livingston and Amit Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Speights et al v. Stac Biziness Solutions, LLC
as 1:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kittson Speights, Julie Livingston, Seva Thornton, LLC and others
Defendant:
Stac Biziness Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
