Cases 41 - 50 of 50
USA v. Charles William
as 08-30241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES LLOYD WILLIAMS
Bay City Partners, LLC v. Wis-Bay City, LLC et al.
as 3:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Bay City Partners, LLC, Bay City Partners, LLC, Bay City Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Wis-Bay City, LLC, Lloyd Williams and Gulfstream Fuels, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Williams v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00811
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lloyd Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bostick v. University Health Systems et al
as 5:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kim Eric Bostick
Defendant:
University Health Systems, Bexar County Jail and Lloyd Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Orr v. Williams et al
as 5:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
William Orr
Defendant:
Lloyd Williams, Bexar County Jail, Comal County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
John LLoyd Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Warren Steel Holdings, LLC et al v. Williams
as 4:2007cv01883
Plaintiff:
Warren Steel Holdings, LLC, Warren Steel Holdings, LLC, Plama Limited and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Williams
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Williams v. Bowersox
as 4:2007cv01093
Petitioner:
Lloyd Williams
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Robert L. Williams
as 06-3954
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Lloyd Williams
WILLIAMS V DVA
as 04-7042
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
LLOYD WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
