Cases 41 - 50 of 73
HAMPTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv01966
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE LEMMON and MIKE PENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMPTON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2015cv00341
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE and THERESA LITTLEJOHN
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Sood et al
as 1:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Hampton
Defendant:
Kul B Sood and Stephanie Dorethy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HAMPTON v. LEMMON
as 2:2015cv00178
Petitioner:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Respondent:
BRUCE LEMMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMPTON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2015cv00135
Defendant:
DICK BROWN and KEVIN HUNTER
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tricia M Hampton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hampton v. Fee et al
as 1:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Edward M Hampton
Defendant:
William C Fee, Michael W Hess and Robert J Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Hampton v. Linda Miller, et al
as 14-2870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS M. HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA MILLER, Mail Room Supervisor, in her individual and official capacity, STEVEN R. GANS, Correctional Counselor II, in his individual and official capacity, GARY L. PAMPEL, Correctional Liesure Activity Specialist II, in is individual and official capacity and others
Tiffney Hampton v. USA
as 14-2761
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIFFNEY M. HAMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
