Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCCALL v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
GARY LAMAR MCCALL, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell McCall's, Inc. v. Schwan's Global Supply Chain, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Russell McCall's, Inc.
Defendant:
Schwan's Global Supply Chain, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Schwan's Global Supply Chain, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Russell McCall's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LeCroy et al v. Wilbros, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ray LeCroy , Diane LeCroy , Catherine Addison and others
Defendant:
Wilbros, LLC , Environmental Concepts, LLC , Wilcorp, Inc. and others
McCall v. Frisky Whisky et al
as 3:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Harry L. McCall
Defendant:
Frisky Whisky, Twyla Latoya Jackson, Elizabeth Ann Alaminz and others
McCall v. Frisky Whisky et al
as 3:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Harry L. McCall
Defendant:
Frisky Whisky, Twyla Latoya Jackson, Elizabeth Ann Alaminz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Republic Services, Inc. et al v. Allgreen Services, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Republic Services, Inc. and Republic Services of Georgia
Defendant:
Allgreen Services, LLC , Samuel Sullivan , James Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01665
Plaintiff:
Santiago Calderon Mendez
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brown, Scandrett, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2011cv01503
Plaintiff:
Najee Travis
Defendant:
Gwinnett County , Gwinnett County Police Department, Dennis Hennelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
