Cases 41 - 50 of 681
Mourice Neal El v. Michael Duggan
as 23-1656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DUGGAN and MICHAEL EDWARD DUGGAN
USA v. Michael Edwards
as 23-3549
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARDS
May v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward May
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Monteagudo v. Mac Edwards Produce & Company, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60894
Plaintiff:
Edgar Monteagudo
Defendant:
Mac Edwards Produce & Company, Inc., Michael Edwards, Mildred Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ireland et al v. Madera County Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Lavonda Louise Ireland and Michael Edward Muehlemann
Defendant:
Madera County Police Department, Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Madera County of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Muehlemann et al v. Adventist Health Hanford
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann and Lavonda Louise Ireland
Defendant:
Adventist Health Hanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Muehlemann et al v. Santillan et al
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Muehlemann and Lavonda Louise Ireland
Defendant:
Fernando Santillan and Adventist Health Hanford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Ottinger
as 23-897
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD OTTINGER, JR.
AQUINO v. BREEDE
as 3:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AQUINO
Defendant:
MICHAEL EDWARD BREEDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
