Cases 41 - 50 of 485
Amos v. Kelly et al
as 0:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
Howard W. Amos
Defendant:
Ryan Kelly, Chad Conner, Peng Moua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller-Wade v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv02025
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dakota Miller-Wade
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Paatalo v. Judd et al
as 0:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
James A. Paatalo
Defendant:
Johnathan R Judd, Kevin M Miller, Michelle Eldien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Stocker et al v. City of Delano et al
as 0:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Stocker and David Miller
Defendant:
City of Delano, Sean Deringer and City of Delano, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Favors v. Reese et al
as 0:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Ryan Reese, Stephie Miller, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 0:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clervrain et al v. Coffman et al
as 0:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Delzs Rigarte Cineus
Defendant:
Cynthia Coffman, Jared Polis, Philip J. Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
