Cases 41 - 50 of 93
John Quaak v. Yeager, et al
as 12-20231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MARK QUAAK
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT YEAGER, LEVESTON, Substitute Counselor, OFFICER ALEXANDRIA and others
Jerome Wells v. Ernie Moore, et al
as 11-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE L. MOORE, Warden, et al.
Tony Haynes v. T. Moore, et al
as 11-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY L. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
T. MOORE, WARDEN, CROWLEY, DENTIST and WILY, DENTIST
Mujtabaa Mubashshir, et al v. Ernie Moore, et al
as 11-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUJTABAA L. MUBASHSHIR
Plaintiff:
GIBREAL JALLOW, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden, Director, Ohio Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, WARREN BURBURY, Chaplain Head, North Central Correctional Institution, JAQUELYN BURN, Chaplain, North Central Correctional Institution and others
In re: Jeffrey Woods, et al v. Ernie Moore, et al
as 11-3147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY A. WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE L. MOORE, Warden, HUGH QUILL, MONA PARKS and others
Frank Brown, Jr. v. Gilbert Harwood, et al
as 11-3082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK C. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GILBERT A. HARWOOD, KIM A. CHAPMAN, JEFF NOBLE and others
Marcus Smith v. S. Moore, et al
as 10-17949
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS JAMES SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee:
S. R. MOORE, Warden
Morgan Kane v. Steve Moore
as 10-17858
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORGAN JAMES KANE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE MOORE, Warden
Darryl Liverman v. Harris Gubernik
as 10-4180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. LIVERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN CROWE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BCCF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES, HARRIS GUBERNIK, EDWARD DONNELLY, SHERIFF and others
Benjamin Robinson v. Department of Rehabilitation a, et al
as 10-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
