Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Jamali v. Hyatt et al
as 2:2012cv02702
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Emma Hyatt, Amy Jane Hyatt, David Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Miles v. Reed et al
as 2:2012cv02625
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wade Miles
Defendant:
Unknown Reed and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. USA
as 2:2012cv01600
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eustace Shawn Miles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AllChem Performance Products Incorporated v. Aqualine Warehouse LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01520
Plaintiff:
AllChem Performance Products Incorporated
Defendant:
Aqualine Warehouse LLC, Cactus Valley Pool Services and Repairs LLC, Chad Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Macey & Aleman et al v. Davis Miles McGuire Gardner PLLC
as 2:2012cv01419
Defendant:
Davis Miles McGuire Gardner PLLC
Plaintiff:
Macey & Aleman , Thomas G Macey and Jeffrey J Aleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stoller, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company et al
as 2:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, Robert P Kelly, Gerald L Hassell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Forbis et al v. Rajcevich et al
as 2:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
Walter E Forbis
Defendant:
Joseph Rajcevich, Dale Shepard, Linda H Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Forbis et al v. Rajcevich et al
as 3:2012cv08112
Plaintiff:
Walter E Forbis and Russell-Jay Gould
Defendant:
Joseph Rajcevich, Dale Shepard, Linda H Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mile v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01064
Petitioner:
Robert A Mile
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01052
Petitioner:
Lawrence Wade Miles
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
