Cases 41 - 50 of 1,419
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 1:2023cv04845
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29107
Plaintiff:
DARREN MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27262
Plaintiff:
WILL MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
United States v. Elmer Mims
as 23-3218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Elmer Mims, also known as Unc
BENNING v. GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. WHITTINGTON, et al.
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03136
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mims v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13742
Plaintiff:
Sherry Mims
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
