Cases 41 - 50 of 59
WILSON v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2008cv00349
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY WILSON
Defendant:
ALLEN FINNAN, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF, UNKNOWN AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Smith
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Linda Jeffers, E Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adria Deaton-Gray v. Marilyn Moores
as 08-2941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIA DEATON-GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, JAMES W. PAYNE, Director of DCS and others
Smith v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Smith
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Linda Jeffers, E Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EDWARDS v. SCHEGGEL et al
as 1:2008cv00826
Plaintiff:
STEVEN EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOUG SCHEGGEL, JANNA SKELTON and MITCH DANIELS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. Scheggel et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Steven Edwards
Defendant:
Doug Scheggel, Janna Skelton and Mitch Daniels
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 08-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
DEATON-GRAY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00479
Plaintiff:
ADRIA DEATON-GRAY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEATON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA DEATON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FROSCHAUER v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
BARRY I FROSCHAUER
Defendant:
ALAN FINNAN, MITCH DANIELS, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
