Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Nevels v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Nevels
Defendant:
Kenneth Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Robinson et al
as 4:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Pennington, Jr.
Defendant:
Jackie Robinson, Ken Conlee, Gary Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
John L. Williams
Defendant:
Ken Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington et al v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00867
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Pennington, Jr., Anthony L. Nevels and John L. Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Robinson et al
as 4:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
John L. Williams
Defendant:
Jackie Robinson, Ken Conlee, Gary Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Benjamin et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00712
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Pharma AG, Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Benjamin , Alyssa Korecky-Zucchini , Veronica Gillotte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04257
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morrow v. Wallace
as 4:2012cv01453
Petitioner:
Gregory Morrow
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vimont v. Haugen et al
as 6:2012cv03318
Plaintiff:
Eric Vimont
Defendant:
Bryon Haugen , Cindy Bilyeu , Charles E. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
