Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Copeland et al v. C.A.A.I.R. et al
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Arthur Copeland , Brandon Spurgin , Brad McGahey and others
Defendant:
C.A.A.I.R., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Pet Food, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nichols v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
Roy Nichols
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cornforth v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Richard L Cornforth
Defendant:
Traci Clark, Phil Cole, William Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong
Defendant:
William McCormick, Nichols Gamble, Katie Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hensley v. Nichols Hills City of et al
as 5:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Hensley
Defendant:
Nichols Hills City of , Michael Puckett , Jordan Corn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Canadian County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kade Davis and Nichole Young
Defendant:
Canadian County Board of County Commissioners , Randall Edwards, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Straigis et al v. Midwest Geriatric Management, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Crystal Straigis , Thomas Straigis , Katherine Straigis and others
Defendant:
Midwest Geriatric Management, LLC and MGM Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Estes v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Nichole Lynnae Estes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Medearis, Jr. v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Robert Park Medearis, Jr.
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of and Jason Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
