Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
MENDEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2012cv02332
Plaintiff: FRANKIE LEE MENDEZ
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON and TODD L. BUSKIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HITCHO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2012cv01902
Plaintiff: GEORGE HITCHO
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, TODD BUSKIRK and MICHAL BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE et al
as 2:2011cv06566
Plaintiff: DANIEL WARREN
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
as 5:2011cv06036
Plaintiff: GIOVANNI SANDERS
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. GALLO et al
as 5:2011cv04875
Plaintiff: JASON D. DANIELS
Defendant: GALLO and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03206
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. CAPUTO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv02603
Plaintiff: ROGER ALLEN JOHNSON
Defendant: EMELIA CAPUTO , VICTORIA GESSNER , WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. ARAMARK et al
as 5:2011cv02479
Plaintiff: DANIEL WARREN
Defendant: ARAMARK, PRIMCARE MEDICAL INC., NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Camarero et al
as 3:2011cv00339
Plaintiff: Victor Gonzalez
Defendant: Grabiel Camarero, Jose Aparicio, Senior Probation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. CAMARERO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00995
Plaintiff: VICTOR GONZALEZ
Defendant: GRABIEL CAMARERO, JOSE APARICIO, SENIOR PROBATION OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?