Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08849
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Impulse Technology Ltd.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Ubisoft Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05320
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-56067
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-56068
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MAINSOURCE BANK v. NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
MAINSOURCE BANK
Defendant:
NAMCO CYBERTAINMENT, INC. and ALAN L. ROLFES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Hodak v. NAMCO LLC
as 1:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
Joan Hodak
Defendant:
NAMCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, INC., et al v. Bradley Sharp, et al
as 10-60048
Debtor:
In re: NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
Appellant:
ARIZONA TEMPE TOWN LAKE, LLC, BUSINESS TO BUSINESS MARKETS, INC. and THEODORE KOHAN
Appellee:
BRADLEY D. SHARP, Chapter 11 Trustee of NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, Inc. and ROYA BOUCHERIAN
In re: NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
as 10-60047
Debtor:
In re: NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
Appellant:
ARIZONA TEMPE TOWN LAKE, LLC, BUSINESS TO BUSINESS MARKETS, INC. and THEODORE KOHAN
Appellee:
BRADLEY D. SHARP, Chapter 11 Trustee of NAMCO CAPITAL GROUP, Inc. and ROYA BOUCHERIAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
