Cases 41 - 50 of 255
El Bey v. Schwarz et al
as 1:2018cv03695
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia, Wayne M. Purdom, All Judges, Clerks, Law Officers, Prosecutors and Third Party Joiners and others
Plaintiff:
Haashim El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redden v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodger Dale Redden
Defendant:
Governor Nathan Deal and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahrer v. Deal et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
Leslie Abernathy-Maddox, Janet Bagely, Russel Troy McClelland and others
Plaintiff:
John J. Rahrer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis Inc., Dr. Sharon Lewis, Dr. Mary Alston and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Mclain Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE et al
as 7:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES L GARLAND, SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v OLENS et al
as 5:2018cv00209
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
SAMUEL OLENS, STATE OF GEORGIA and NATHAN DEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. County of Effingham et al
as 4:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
County of Effingham , Richard Rafter , Heather Wadrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Gordon et al
as 6:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
Darrel Gordon, Mikasa Cooper, William Summersett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
