Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 70
PCL Construction Services Inc v. North American Capacity Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv05758
Defendant: North American Capacity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: PCL Construction Services Inc
Type: Contract Insurance
Heritage Roofing, LLC v. PCL Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02061
Plaintiff: Heritage Roofing, LLC
Defendant: PCL Construction Services, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Heritage Roofing, LLC v. PCL Construction Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02059
Defendant: PCL Construction Services, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Plaintiff: Heritage Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
B&H Contractors of SD v. George Fischer, Inc., et al
as 13-2224
Plaintiff: PCL Construction Services, Inc.
Defendant: B&H Contractors of South Dakota
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant: B&H Contractors of South Dakota
Third Party Defendant - Appellee: George Fischer, Inc., George Fischer Sloane, Inc., Central States Industrial Supply, Inc. and others
Butterfield et al v. Yaeger Architecture, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00509
Plaintiff: Kevin Butterfield and Stacy Butterfield
Defendant: Yaeger Architecture, Inc. , Merrick and Company , Structural Engineering Associates and others
Third_party_defendant: J.R. Harris and Company, Leavcon II, Inc., ACI Concrete Placement of Kansas, LLC and others
Third_party_plaintiff: PCL Construction Services, Inc.
Cross_claimant: PCL Construction Services, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Merrick and Company , Structural Engineering Associates and Yaeger Architecture, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams & Smith, Inc. v. PCL Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff: Adams & Smith Inc
Defendant: PCL Construction Services Inc, City of Seattle, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Illinois National Insurance Co, et al v. Nordic PCL Construction, Inc., et al
as 13-15410
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant - Appellant: ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant-plaintiff - Appellee: NORDIC PCL CONSTRUCTION, INC., FKA Nordic Construction, Ltd.
Third-party-defendant: MARSH USA, INC.
Type: Contract Insurance
Board of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund et al v. Superior Steel & Ironworkers, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00387
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund , Northwest Ironworkers Retirement Trust , Northwest Field Ironworkers Annuity Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Superior Steel & Ironworkers, LLC, PCL Construction Services, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company et al v. Steadfast Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv00284
Plaintiff: Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Defendant: Steadfast Insurance Company, Nordic/PCL, Nordic PCL Constuction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
United States of America for the use and benefit of Capri Industries, Inc. v. PCL Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00095
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: PCL Construction Services, Inc. , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?