Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Splawn Construction Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00911
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Splawn Construction Inc and Pittman Waller Roofing Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. City of Leighton, Alabama et al
as 3:2014cv02414
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pittman
Defendant:
City of Leighton, Alabama and Lance Pace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pittman v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
Windham Todd Pittman
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Pat Craig, Teresa Spence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nashville-Hyter v. Nashville et al
as 1:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Erica Nashville-Hyter
Defendant:
Sherlean N. White Nashville, Joyce Nashville-Moore, James Albert Miles, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Voestalpine Nortrak Inc
as 2:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
Chris Pittman
Defendant:
Voestalpine Nortrak Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pittman v. GE Capital
as 2:2014cv01466
Plaintiff:
James Pittman
Defendant:
GE Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin-El v. Griffin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Marvin Franklin-El
Defendant:
Gregory O. Griffin, Meredith Hamilton Barnes, Dana Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sears v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00911
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Sears
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Cynthia Dillard, Ms. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Tammy Pittman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
