Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Trevor Jones v. Pat Smith, et al
as 08-1857
Petitioner - Appellant:
Trevor L. Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
Pat Smith and Jeremiah (Jay) W. Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri
Phillips v. River Correctional Center et al
as 1:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Phillips
Defendant:
River Correctional Center, Pat Smith, Kenneth W Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Smith et al
as 3:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Phillips
Defendant:
Pat Smith, Kenneth W. Byrnes, Gregory Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Box v. Larry Crawford, et al
as 08-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward D. Box
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Crawford, Director, MDOC, Tom Clement, Assistant Director, Steve Long, Zone Director and others
Anderson v. Larkins et al
as 4:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Anderson
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, Pat Smith, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin v. Smith et al
as 3:2007cv01208
Plaintiff:
Diane Larkin
Defendant:
Pat Smith, John Nixon, Northeast Florida State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burton v. Smith
as 4:2007cv01868
Petitioner:
Mark Burton
Respondent:
Pat Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sefu v. Smith et al
as 4:2007cv01709
Plaintiff:
Azizi Oba Sefu
Defendant:
Lance B. Smith, Douglas A. Worsham, Randy Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Smith
as 4:2007cv01581
Petitioner:
Chad C. Carter
Respondent:
Pat Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Smith
as 6:2007cv03300
Petitioner:
Trevor L. Jones
Respondent:
Pat Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
