Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Daniels v. Cox et al
as 0:2009cv02544
Plaintiff:
Jermel R Daniels
Defendant:
Travis Cox, Sgt Holtzclaw, Sgt Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Drennon v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv02547
Plaintiff:
Litido Lamonta Torez Drennon
Defendant:
Phillip Anderson, Boldman, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Norman et al v. Anderson et al
as 9:2009cv02332
Plaintiff:
Rahmad Norman, Victor Daring, Chris Norman and others
Defendant:
Phillip Anderson, Officer Murray and Officer Tenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ricketts v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthew Ricketts
Defendant:
Phillip Anderson, Sharon Middleton, NFN McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Norman v. Lark et al
as 9:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Luke Lark, Sargant Woody, Travis Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Devette v. Anderson et al
as 0:2009cv01733
Plaintiff:
Curtis Devette
Defendant:
Phillip Anderson, Dr Gardeneer, Cpt Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Addison v. Vernon Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
Alan K Addison
Defendant:
Vernon Correctional Facility, LA Dept of Corrections, Floyd Willis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Square D Company
as 2:2008at00640
Plaintiff:
Square D Company
Defendant:
Chawn Phillip Anderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Square D. Company vs. Anderson
as 2:2008cv01312
Plaintiff:
Square D. Company
Defendant:
Chawn Phillip Anderson, Heather Marie Apodaca and AA & M Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Brunson
as 08-35132
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PHILLIP ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN BRUNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
